...are every where: commercial or banking agents, writers, politicians, correspondents for newspapers of all shades, with one foot in the bank, the other in the socialist movement, and with their behinds sitting on the German daily press — they have taken possession of all the newspapers — and you can imagine what kind of sickening literature they produce.
-Mikhail Bakunin, Father of Anarchism
...when the truth is a crime and the liars and their genocides are exalted, there is no easy way back up into the light from the depth of hell into which you have sunk. amazing cretins these people, the ultimate fascists.
THE MERCILESS SLAUGHTER OF GAZAN CIVILIANS and the approval by World Jewry has put the nations on notice that an inherent evil is at work within Jewry’s approach to human affairs.
-Brother Nathanael Kapner, Christian Convert
This law undermines the value of free speech for our country. This law deprives us of a valuable weapon – speech with which we can denounce our enemies.
-Alan Borovoy
The Zionists are crooks. A small handful of Zionists, with a very intricate organization, have taken over the power centers of the world. According to our estimates, the main cadre of the Zionists consists of 2,000 individuals at most, and they have another 8,000 activists.
As the picture of the current economy disaster becomes ever more clear, it becomes rather obvious, to me at least, that the ideology and the people who are directly responsible for the mass killing of millions of Iraqis and the displacement of many other millions, the people who keep the Palestinians starved behind walls, are unfortunately very much the same people who are responsible for a class genocide of millions of disenfranchised Americans who are now on the brink of total dispossession.
...the neocons have now become the conservative establishment. When Kristol (or Bill O'Reilly or Sean Hannity) hold forth at Fox News, most people have no idea that they are tuning into the public face of a fundamentally Jewish movement that elbowed out more traditional conservatives.
The Jewish community should expose 9-11 because the secret actions of a few Jews (and non-Jews) has put all Jews in jeopardy. Instead, Jews stupidly implicate themselves by attacking truth seekers. All 9-11 conspiracy-deniers are accomplices in the cover-up.
-Dr Henry Makow
The fact that the NYT considers the prospect of an Israeli mass extermination of millions of Iranians part of the policy debate in the Middle East reveals the degree to which Zionofascism has infected the ‘higher’ cultural and journalist circles of the United States.
In an effort to suppress my inquiries, publicly destroy my reputation, and isolate me from my peers, the defendants launched the most vile kind of personal attack - attempting to stigmatize a Jewish man as an anti-semite - because I dared examine and expose their pernicious activities. These rich and powerful people pretend to be friends of higher learning but are in fact its worst enemies. They think they have bought themselves a university. They haven’t.
One cannot take a place as a responsible editor in the free church press without angering some people. There is usually a way in which controversy can be carried on with decency. However, I have found no way to criticize the policies of the State of Israel, or question the philosophy of political Zionism, or tell my readers what the facts of the Middle East are, and escape slander and libel from the Zionist-Israeli community.
The warrant details six offences involving one or more of former assistant deputy health minister Ron Danderfer, former Fraser Health Authority network services manager Jim Taylorand doctor Jonathan Burns. The allegations relate to business Burns did with each of the Fraser Health Authority and the provincial health ministry.
Burns and Taylor are obviously names of J-ws. What of Danderfer?
Doesn’t look quite Western European to me, looks like there are the Khazarian bloodlines there
Perhaps we should heed the words of Eustace Mullins, when he wrote in The Biological Jew:
All of these Jewish vocations have one thing in common, the opportunity for fraud. The Jew always operated from a basis of fraud, and slipped easily from one vocation into another. A Jew practices medicine in one city, and, leaving behind a trail of corpses, turns up in another town as a soothsayer. After some widows are bilked of their life savings, he again takes to the road, assisted, as always, by the international Jewish community. In another town, he becomes a student priest, and soon he offers daring new interpretations of the religious beliefs, until his superiors find that he is stealthily transforming every tenet of their faith into some strange and barbaric dogma. He moves on, and turns up in another city as a highly trusted government official, respected by all, until, one evening, the gates of the city are opened to an invader, and the Jew becomes the Grand Vizier of the conquerors.
and:
A gentile government which had as its concern the health of the nation would convict the Jewish parasite and cast him off. This has happened hundreds of times in recorded history. Therefore, the Jew knows that his first task, upon arriving in a gentile community, is to subvert and take over its government, and to paralyse the people with subtle injections of poison, so that they become helpless and unable to defend themselves. Thus, the Jew begins agitation to set up a “progressive” government, also known as a “popular front,” a “democratic” government, a “people’s” government, a “liberal” government, and all of these are synonyms for the Jewish government, which will protect the presence of the parasite and guard it against the anger of the exploited gentiles.
Mired in another provincial spending scandal for eHealth, this time in British Columbia and not Ontario, are two prominent figures who bilked taxpayers out of millions of dollars through fraudulent accounting practices. Career civil servant Ron Danderfer was the assistant deputy health minister who brought in practicing Abbotsford physician Jonathan Burns to provide consulting services for the electronic public health records. Dr.Burns started at $100 an hour in 2005 to a maximum consulting limit of $160,800 a year, but that soon escalated to $195 an hour and increased the maximum value of the contract to $1 million a year.
All of the allegations are unproven in a court of law, but this case becomes yet another example of the fraud and breach of trust issues that seem part and parcel to attempts to bring in electronic health records in this country. The invoices tell a very conclusive story of abuse, as Dr.Burns was milking both sides of the public health cow.
In March 2007, Dr.Burns billed the Ministry of Health for 168 hours of consulting work, while also billing regional health authorities for 144 hours in the same month. Broken down to working every day, seven days a week for a month, it would total 10 hours a day. Assuming the doctor worked a regular five-hour work week, it would equal 16 hours of work on those days. The next month that total reached 483 hours of billing, 16 hours a day for a 7-day work week, or the mathematical impossibility of 24 hours a day for five days a week.
Meanwhile, in a move that reeks of nepotism, Mr.Danderfer hired his wife and his daughter on a contractual basis. Private emails between Mr.Danderfer and Dr.Burns reveal ways in which family members would receive kickbacks and share holdings in the creation of a private company purchased with public money.
Province columnist Michael Smyth has detailed the scandal which has rocked the Gordon Campbell government, in which Dr.Burns developed close relationships with high-level bureaucrats in the Health Ministry who waived through his weighty invoices. And there’s even more nepotism:
Burns subsequently hired Taylor’s [Jim Taylor, then the health region's manager of network services] then-unemployed wife, Janice, at WebMed where, she told police, she was “kind of the gofer” when she started and was paid “sort of around” $72,000 a year.
WebMed employee Sean Murphy told police the boss didn’t have a high opinion of Janice, saying Burns told him: “I don’t want to be around that fat woman.” Janice told police her duties at WebMed included handing out pamphlets at hospitals.
This wasn’t the first time that Jim Taylor has been involved in fraud allegations. At the time he was hired as director of communications systems at the Fraser Valley health region in April 2000, he was under house arrest and prohibited from handling any money other than his own after receiving a sentence of two years less a day for bankrupting the White Rock Sea Festival Society.
What is sure to follow is a thorough investigation of how high up in the Campbell government it was known what abuses were taking place, and who will have to fall on their sword to divert attention away from those powerful people.
Former Saskatchewan native leader David Ahenakew, who fought a high-profile legal battle after he was accused of inciting hatred against Jews, has died after a long battle with cancer. He was 76.
Photograph by: Ryan Jackson, Canwest News Service
SHELLBROOK, Sask. — Former Saskatchewan native leader David Ahenakew, who fought a high-profile legal battle after he was accused of inciting hatred against Jews, has died after a long battle with cancer, according to media reports.
The 76-year-old reportedly died Friday night in hospital in Shellbrook, about 140 kilometres north of Saskatoon.
On Wednesday, lawyer Doug Christie, who represented Ahenakew after he was charged following a 2002 incident in which he praised Hitler and blamed the Jews for the Second World War, said his client has been ill for some time.
Ahenakew found out he had cancer shortly before his retrial on the hatred charge began in November 2008 but kept it quiet, Christie said.
Christie said the cancer has progressed since the trial ended. “He’s been coping with a lot of problems with his health,” he said.
A former chief of the Federation of Saskatchewan Indian Nations, Ahenakew was convicted of inciting hatred in 2005, but the conviction was overturned on appeal.
A second trial found Ahenakew not guilty.
The native leader’s fall from grace started in December 2002, when he told delegates to a health conference that when he was a young man stationed in Germany, people told him Jews created the Second World War.
Later, he a reporter that Hitler “cleaned up a lot of things,” and did the right thing when “he fried six million of those guys.”
The taped interview was broadcast across Canada and caused a massive public outcry. Ahenakew made a tearful, televised apology and resigned his seat on numerous boards and commissions, and as chair of the Federation of Saskatchewan Indian Nations senate.
He was later stripped of the Order of Canada.
The judge in his retrial last year told Ahenakew his comments were “revolting, disgusting and untrue,” but said he did not have the intent needed to be guilty of a charge of inciting hatred.
Well, it sure looks like good news to me, sort of like when people like it when they see gangsters shooting it out. Apparently this is about the orchestrators protecting themselves should the judicial rats squeal.
Certainly looks like something for further research!
Assassination by induced heart attack is a favorite of the CIA and Mossad.
This is where things start to get spooky. Nine crooked judges linked to this one lawsuit suddenly started dying when Mr. Carten started exposing their crimes. These nine judges were in a postion to blow the whistle on the judiical mafia and how it operates in Canada, especially in British Columbia. Did someone have a motive for murder? You bet they did. The dead judges were not the masterminds behind the WaterWarCrimes. They were merely the footsoldiers directed to attack anyone exposing the WaterWarCrimes. Their targets were, Sun Belt Water Inc., Aquasource Ltd., Mr. Carten and, collaterally, Ms. Gibbs and her family. The generals in this aspect of the WaterWarCrimes remain hidden but they are there, nonetheless, and their soldiers, the judges, are expendable.
Soldiers On A Battlefield
In every war, there are the dead and the wounded; the casualties.
There is a war going on, between Canada and the United States, over fresh water. It is a political war and a legal war. Some say it could lead to a military war.
Mr. Carten and Ms Gibbs were caught in the cross-fire. So were nine Canadian judges. They are dead. Mr. Carten and Ms. Gibbs have survived- so far….
The Canadian and British Columbia Governments targeted Mr. Carten and attempted to destroy him because he was helping the American corporation, Sun Belt Water, Inc., in a lawsuit that threatened to expose political corruption related to fresh water exports at the highest levels of government in Ottawa, Canada’s capital, and in Victoria, the capital of British Columbia, Canada’s western most province.
The Governmentr strategy was simple, destroy Sun Belt’s case by destroying its lawyer, Mr. Carten, and by destroying the woman who had been helping him, Ms. Gibbs, a divorced, single mother with five children. The tools were readily available. Trap them in litigation, insert crooked judges into the cases and create chaos in their lives with crooked judicial rulings. Attack Mr. Carten through the Law Society of British Columbia (a government controlled agency), attempt to get him disbarred, use corrupt psychiatrists to try to discredit him, prevent him from practicing law, railroad him into jail, and bring fraudulent criminal charges against him.
The strategy worked. They were reduced to poverty. Their assests were looted by perverse judicial rulings. Mr. Carten, although never disbarred or suspended, was prevented from practising law in British Columbia.
Their enemies thought they had won but they underestimated who they were dealing with.
Mr. Carten and Ms. Gibbs fought back. They searched for information that would prove to destroy those who had attacked them. They interviewed private citizens from all over British Columbia, Alberta and other parts of Canada who had similar horror stories about the Canadian judiciary and certain prominent Canadian law firms. They spoke with private investigators and police officers. They contacted people outside Canada for information.
They learned about the judicial mafia, a secret group of select judges who control the agenda in Canada’s court system and fix cases for the benefit of their friends and colleagues.
Documents and information came into their possession which proved there had been a criminal conspiracy related to bulk water exports that included the Chief Justice of British Columbia, several BC Attorney Generals, a number of Premiers, one, possibly more, Prime Ministers of Canada and several judges who had acted against us in various court cases.
How Stephen Harper Kept His Promise To Clean Up the Justice System
On October 8, 2005, Mr. Carten hand delivered to Stephen Harper, the Second Police Report, a 100 plus page book of documents showing that Paul Martin’s fellow cabinet, Stephen Owen, Ujjal Dosanjh, and Anne McLellan had been involved in a classic political cover up of criminal misconduct carried out by government employees in the Sun Belt Water Inc litigation. Within eight weeks, Stephen Harper had persuaded NDP leader, Jack Layton, and Bloc Quebecois leader, Gilles Duceppe, to join with him and force Paul Martin’s government out of power.
Did Stephen Harper use the Second Police report to persuade Jack Layton and Gilles Duceppe to destroy Paul Martin? You will have to ask Stephen Harper about that.
Nonetheless, within weeks, Mr. Harper was elected and the first of the nine judges suddenly dropped dead.
We are not accusing Stephen Harper of murder but the reader should keep in mind that Stephen Harper promised to fix the justice system and it is assumed that his investigations may have put pressure on some of the bad guys in the system. The litany of judicial deaths set out below reads like an execution process.
Number 1. - Mr. Justice James Taylor - January 10, 2006
At the same time that we delivered our evidence to Stephen Harper, we began to report to the appropriate authorities, the serious criminal misconduct of Mr. Justice James Taylor of the Supreme Court of British Columbia, appointed to office by Mr. Jean Chretien, and, on January 10, 2006, at his ski cabin on Mt. Washington, Vancouver Island, Judge Taylor suddenly dropped dead, at age 64, in excellent health, from an alleged heart attack. Mr. James Taylor was dead judge number one. Little did we know that by January 18, 2010, nine of the crooked judges, all of whom abused their positions of trust and authority in order to cause us harm, would be dead.
In retrospect, we suspect Mr. Justice Taylor was murdered or committed suicide to avoid public humiliation to himself and his family for the crimes he had committed which were in addition to his judicial attack on Mr. Carten and his family.
We conducted an analysis of the cases Justice Taylor was assigned to. Time and time again, JusticeTaylor was inserted by his masters into cases that had a political dimension and, in those cases, he protected dirty politicians or other government insiders at the expense of the average citizen.
In our opinion, Justice Taylor and the remaining eight dead judges were part of the “judicial mafia”, a term used by an RCMP inspector to describe the group of judges who fix cases in Canada. Since the days of Pierre Trudeau’s government, the RCMP have been restrained from investigating the “judicial mafia” and political crimes because the RCMP have been under direct political control of the federal government by virtue of provisions in the RCMP Act inserted by Mr. Trudeau’s government.
However, as private citizens, we were not restrained from carrying out investigations of those who attacked us. As we collected information from multiple sources about our enemies and starting publishing it, they started dropping dead.
Number 2. - Provincial Court Judge Sid Clark - Deceased Sometime 2007
The second death occurred sometime during 2007, at a date we have not yet confirmed when British Columbia Provincial Court Judge Sid Clark died. Judge Sid Clark was a early player in the strategic judicial attack on Mr. Carten by the Government of Canada. He denied Mr. Carten his fundamental right to call witnesses in his own defence at a trail where his liberty was in issue and set the stage for the subsequent imprisonment of Mr. Carten by another handpicked Provincial Court judge. Judge Clark had hung his head in shame, and stared at his desk when he made his judgment that was part of the railroading of Mr. Carten in 1998. Was Judge Clark’s death in 2007 a co-incidence? Was it related to the fact that Mr. Carten had been publishing the facts of Judge Clark’s misconduct to various authorities in 2006 and 2007? Was Judge Clark murdered to silence him?
Prior to his appointment to the bench Judge Clark was a fine and honourable man and, with the exception of what he did that particular monring in the summer of 1998, we have no information otherwise. The people that compromised the integrity of Sid Clark on that summer morning in 1998 should be hunted down and put in jail.
Number 3. - Mr. Justice Robert Edwards - deceased - November 5, 2007
On November 5, 2007, the third crooked judge, Mr. Justice Robert Edwards, dropped dead from a sudden unexpected heart attack. In May 1996, Justice Edwards was inserted by his masters into a case involving Mr. Carten and made orders that caused serious harm to Mr. Carten, his children and his ex-wife. At the time, we did not understand why Mr. Edwards would attack Mr. Carten but, a year later, documents came into our hands that proved that Mr. Justice Edwards was a key player in the bulk water export crimes when he was Deputy Attorney General of British Columbia.
Other investigations have proved that Mr. Justice Edwards was a key player in the Dr. Kuntz affair, a multi-million dollar medical insurance fraud carried out by the offices of some of Canada’s premier law firms located in Vancouver. What was unsettling about the death of Mr. Justice Edwards was its date. We had been complaining about Mr. Justice Edwards for several years with no apparent result but he dropped dead less than 10 days after we served his former employer, the Attorney General of British Columbia, with legal papers that implicated Justice Edwards as a major player in the criminal conspiracy related to bulk water exports. In addition, November 5th is Guy Fawkes Day in recognition of the Englishman, Guy Fawkes, who attempted to blow up the British Parliament in 1605. As a result of his criminal activities, which violated the laws passed by Parliament and the British Columbia legislature, it was fitting that Mr. Justice Edwards died, was murdered, or committed suicide on Guy Fawkes Day.
Number 4. - Chief Justice Antonio Lamer - retired - Deceased November 24, 2007
On November 24, 2007, the fourth judge, retired Canadian Chief Judge, Antonio Lamer, died, allegedly, from heart disease. Mr. Lamer’s death was less than one month after we served legal papers on the Government of Canada directly implicating retired Justice Lamer in high level corruption that was related to bulk water exports. Was this another co-incidence? Did Mr. Lamer’s health suddenly fail because he knew his crimes were now being exposed? Was Justice Lamer murdered in order to silence him?
Number 5. - British Columbia Chief Justice Alan McEachern - Deceased - January 5, 2008
On January 11, 2008, the fifth judge died. Retired British Columbia Chief Justice, Alan McEachern, allegedly succumbed to cancer. He was 81. His death was about two months after after we served his former employer, the Government of Canada, with the same legal papers that implicated Edwards and Lamer. Those legal papers placed Mr. McEachern squarely in the center of a the criminal conspiracy involving bulk water exports while he was the Chief Justice of British Columbia. Was this another mere co-incidence? Was his death hastened by the realization that involvement in high level corruption was now part of the public record in court proceedings?
Mr. McEachern was a key player in the judicial mafia in British Columbia and, along with BeverleyMcLachlin he used his influence at the Canadian Judicial Council to block many investigations of judicial corruption.
Number 6. - Mr. Justice Rafe Hutchinson - Retired - Deceased - March 2008
On March, 20 2008, the sixth judge died. Retired Justice Ralph Hutchinson, age 77, died less than three weeks after we delivered to him a copy of our Statement of Claim that accused him of participating in a judicial conspiracy to cause harm to Karen Gibbs and her young family as part of the strategy of the Government of Canada. The obituary stated he had been in excellent health but slipped into an illness a few weeks before his death and passed away. Was this another co-incidence? Did Justice Hutchinson develop a guilty conscience so severe that it killed him? Was Justice Hutchinson murdered to prevent him from talking?
Number 7. - Provincial Court of British Columbia Chief Judge Hugh Stansfield - May 7, 2009
For a time, it appeared the dying was over when, on May 7, 2009, judge number seven dropped dead when Provincial Court Chief Judge, Hugh Stansfield, suddenly and mysteriously, died, allegedly, from cancer. Judge Stansfield’s death came a few days after documents were exchanged over the internet that implicated Judge Stansfield in the sexual abuse of children as young as six. This information was being gathered and put into a legal format in the last two weeks of April, 2009, with the intent of filing it in a court in support of a petition to remove Judge Stansfield from office. Agents of the Government of Canada were monitoring that e-mail exhange. Immediately Jim Judd, head of CSIS and Kevin Lynch, Clerk of the Privy Council, announced they would be resigning and Chief Judge Hugh Stansfield was dead by May 7, 2009.
Death by cancer was a convenient alibi because, five years earlier, Judge Stansfield had been treated for cancer but death by cancer defied common sense because Judge Stansfield was seen to be in robust good health at a public hearing on April 25, 2009, yet 12 days later he was dead from a disease that kills slowly over months or years. Did Judge Stansfield really die of cancer? Was he murdered? Did he commit suicide?
If you don’t understand this pedofile stuff then let’s make it very plain. If you want to control a judge, police officer or a bureaucrat, you can bribe him, but that is expensive. If is cheaper and more effective to control him or her through blackmail and a pedofile or someone who delights in child porn is very easy to blackmail. There have been persistent rmumours that there was a nest of pedofiles operating in the justice and police systems in Canada. This is no co-incidence.
Judge Stansfield and his legal assistant had been a key player in the malicious prosecution and attempted railroading of former Sun Belt Water lawyer, John Carten, by insiders with the Government of British Columbia. That prosecution commenced January 30, 2008, nine days after the Statement of Claim in Action T-95-08 was filed in the Federal Court.
This was a mean-minded, dirty prosecution based on fraudulent statements given to the police by ChiefJudge Stansfield’s legal assistant, Brenda Edwards, complaints were filled with Premier Gordon Campbell and BC Attorney General, Wally Oppal, that Chief Judge Stansfield was refusing to carry out an investigation of BC Provincal Court Judge Brian Klaver and BC Law Society CEO, Tim McGee, who had been secretly communicating with each other in some mysterious way to set aside subpoenas that had been issued to compel Mr. McGee to appear in court as a witness in a case where the BC Government was trying to put the accused in jail and the Law Society was a party to the offence in question. Judge Brian Klaver was the trial judge.
Chief Judge Stansfield was a dirty judge appointed to his position by Premier Gordon Campbell. Prior to his appointment to the bench Judge Stansfield was also a significant player in the medical insurance fraud we have previously referred to as the Dr. Kuntz Affair.
Within a month of the death of Judge Stansfield, on June 11, 2009, another Defendant in Federal Court Action, T-95-08, BC Supreme Court Chief Justice, Donald Brenner, suddenly announced he was taking early retirement. It was obvious that Mr. Brenner was beginning to feel the heat and, perhaps, someone was starting to ask him questions he did not wish to answer.
Mr. Brenner’s early retirement, at age 64, when he could sit to age 75, reminded us of the early retirements taken by Canada’s Chief Justice, Antonio Lamer, in August 1999, and BC Supreme Court Chief Justice, Bryan Williams, in February 2000 after complaints had been filed about Williams between July and December 1999 that linked mis-conduct by Williams to then sitting Prime Minister Jean Chretien. Mr. Brenner had been a shadowy figure in the judicial attack on Mr. Carten. As Chief Justice, Mr. Brenner was probably responsible for assigning the crooked Mr. Justice Taylor to Mr. Carten’s case. The role of Mr. Brenner in this matter is not fully explored due to the stalling and delay by Mr. Justice Lutfy and the prothonotary Mr Lafreniere in the Federal Court and the refusal of the Minister of Justice to respond to our requests for an investigation.
The resignation of Bryan Williams was front page news in British Columbia in the first week of February, 2000, but the Canadian Judicial Council Executive Director, Jeannie Thomas, and British Columbia’sChief Justice, Allan McEachern, both defendants in Action T-95-08, immediately set out to deceive and bamboozle the Canadian public by falsely denying that there had been any complaints about or investigation of Chief Justice Williams prior to his resignation. There certainly were complaints and there certainly had been an investigation. Canada’s new Chief Justice Beverly McLachlin and every member of her court was advised that the statements by Mr. McEachern and Ms. Thomas were fraudulent but, to date, no action has been taken to amend the public record.
We have added Chief Justice McLachlin as a defendant to our action because she is the Chairperson of the Canadian Judicial Council and, as such, she has a legal and ethical duty to insure the CanadianJudicial Council does not engage in fraud, deception, or deceit as it has.
Mr. Carten contacted Globe and Mail reporter Robert Matas who, in a story he had written, quoted the fraudulent statement by Jeannie Thomas and he informed Mr. Matas that both Ms. Thomas and Chief Justice McEachern were not telling the truth. Although initially interested, Mr. Matas and his publisher declined to issue a public correction or retraction and, arguably, the Globe and Mail has been a party to a fraud.
The Vancouver Sun and the Victoria Times Colonist were also contacted and advised their stories about the events leading to the resignation of Chief Justice Williams were factually wrong and they too refused to print a retraction.
So, ask yourself. What is going on?
Why did NINE judges, all connected to one case, suddenly begin to drop dead when our legal process exposed them as participants in a criminal scheme?
Were any of them murdered?
Why did two Chief Justices of the BC Supreme Court, who played a role in this matter and who were appointed to office by Prime Minister Jean Chretien and his colleagues, suddenly resign?
Why did the Chief Justice of BC and the official spokesperson for the judiciary in Canada lie to the public in March of 2000?
Why did the Globe and Mail, the Vancouver Sun other newspapers publish false information that has misled the Canadian public for almost a decade?
Why has the CBC never explained to Canadians the facts about the corruption that took place in relation to bulk water exports to the USA when it has broadcast a number of stories about bulk water exports but always steering clear of the political corruption issues?
Why did the Federal Court prothonotary Mr. Roger Lafreniere refuse to process two relatively simple court applications in Action T-95-08 for over a year?
Was Roger Lafreniere acting under directions to stall and delay?
Why did Chief Justice Lutfy, who was so close to Jean Chretien that he interviewed potential cabinet ministers, appoint Roger Lafreniere, a prothonotary, to be the case management judge in Action T-95-08 when we had requested a real judge because of the seriousness of the case?
Why is the present Minister of Justice, Rob Nicholson, and the present BC Attorney General, MikeDejong, opposing our application to have our case heard by a judge who enjoys security of tenure instead of a clerk of the court, Mr. Lafreniere, who has no security of tenure, and who can fired at the will of Stepehn Harper’s Conservative government or by some future Liberal government?
Number 8. - Mr. Justice David Vickers - November 15, 2009
And then there was the death of Mr. Justice David Vickers on November 15, 2009 another prediction come true.
According to his obituary, David Vickers was diagnosed with terminal cancer in July, 2009, only two months after Mr. Carten and Ms. Gibbs predicted “more destruction and death” in a letter to Prime Minister Harper, Justice Minister Nicholson, Kevin Lynch, Clerk of the Privy Council, and John Sims, Deputy Minister of Justice.
On page two of the letter Mr. Carten and Ms. Gibbs wrote:
“Once again, we are offering you and your colleagues the opportunity to settle our claim justly and on established principles of law and equity, instead of compelling us to move forward in a manner that will, under karmic law lead to more death and destruction”.
The offer was rejected and David Vickers died on November 15, 2009.
David Vickers had been Deputy Attorney General for British Columbia from 1973 to 1976.
Due to his connections with the Ministry of the Attorney General he was close to Robert Edwards, the former Deputy Attorney General who guided the British Columbia government in its breach of the Free Trade Agreement, the GATT and the Water Act.
David Vickers was also close to long term employee of the Minstry of the Attorney General,William Pearce, the lawyer who led the strategy of fraud, fraudulent concealment, perjury and obstruction of justice in the Sun Belt Water lawsuit. Like William Pearce, David Vickers had a second home on Thetis Island, a small island located north of the City of Victoria.
We have not yet determined if David Vickers had his home provided to him “free of charge” like one was provided to William Pearce by an unknown benefactor.
David Vickers played a central role in the cover up of the War War Crimes which included his participation in two perverse judgments that prevented Aquasource Ltd., a company hoping to develop a water export business, from obtaining access to the “cabinet submission” that proved the British Columbia government was violating international trade law in order to favour “friends of the government”.
Because of David Vickers fraudulent application of the law, Aquasource Ltd. and Sun Belt Water Inc. were forced into lengthy and costly litigation.
If David Vickers had not been a crooked judge, both cases might have been resolved long long ago.
In addition, David Vickers showed up as a secret agent for the British Columbia government in 1996 as presiding judge at a pre-trial conference in Mr. Carten’s divorce proceedings and he fed back critical information that allowed the BC Government to sabotage Mr. Carten by later inserting its agent, Robert Edwards, as the judge at the divorce trial. This is how the Government manipulated the strings in the court system.
While most people think cancer is a physical dis-ease it often has its genesis in emotional issues. David Vickers knew he had done wrong. He knew he had harmed people by it. His conscience worked on him. He was ill at ease with himself because of it and became dis-eased. He developed cancer and died.
Or was David Vickers murdered by insiders who gave him one a dose of some of the chemical weapon often used to actually cause cancer in intended victims. David Vickers knew some secrets and he was a liability.
Number 9. - Mr. Justice John Bouck deceased January 18, 2010
Justice John Bouck is dead judge number nine. He was retired and aged 79. So, we aren’t trying to persuade you there was a murder here.
Justice John Bouck was one of the players in the cover up of the WaterWarCrimes. In 1997, he made a perverse, i.e. crooked ruling, against Sun Belt Water Inc. There were two cases that stated the applicable law. One by the Supreme Court of Canada, the other by the Ontario Court of Appeal. Mr. Justice Bouck decided he would not follow the law that was given to him by lawyers for both the Crown and Sun Belt. This was wrong. Mr. Bouck caused a lot of harm to some innocent people by not following the law. He earned bad karma.
Justice John Bouck, probably acting under instructions from insiders, also made unnecessary and legally incorrect comments about the likelihood of success of the claim of Sun Belt Water Inc. This also earned him bad karma.
Mr. Justice John Bouck loved the law. He wrote many books and articles. He also blew the whistle on the inordinate powers of the Chief Justice in a series of articles that appeared in Canadian newspapers in 1998 that may have been prompted by the pressure put upon him in 1997 to make a false judgment against Sun Belt Water Inc.
Our sources have advised Mr. Justice John Bouck was personally threatened for publishing this material about the powers of the Chief Justice.
Number 10. - Mr. or Mrs. Justice ? - The Empty Coffin Awaits You
There are several judges named in the WaterWarCrimes who deliberately did injustice and who remain alive. There are some against whom our allegations may be wrong and, if so, we deeply apologize and encourage you to clarify your position by contacting us at waterwarcrimes@gmail.com But, there are others who know that they did wrong. We encourage those who know they did wrong to make amends by coming clean. Doing so will help to balance your karma.
Well, this can’t be bad news… a bunch of dead scumbag judges in BC, Yeah! Hopefully there will be plenty more, including the higher-up scum that are behind the killings. Oh yeah Harper, you and the scumbags that orchestrate you, won’t be able to hide in a Belgian coven. The noose is looking for you.
The Grand Plan To Steal Canada’s Water Resource Wealth:
9 Judges Associated with Scandal Die Suddenly!
(Paul’s Note: This article was submitted by the author as a direct result of my “Calling All Whistle Blowers”. This is what happens when Fascists in High-level Government conspire against the marketplace. They have done everything to destroy this whistleblower, who will tell his story on my Monday Radio Program 12 PM Eastern. The show is recorded so, to listen, click on the LINK)
For decades, political and business insiders, with Canadian and British Columbian governments, have known that the water resources in the American southwest and Mexico were dwindling in the face of an increasing population. A small group of Canadian political insiders saw the opportunity to earn massive profits for themselves from the export of Canada’s fresh water and set about on a fraudulent and corrupt scheme to capture for themselves an illegal water export monopoly so they could line their pockets with revenues from the sale of Canadian public assests and gouge American consumers.
In the process these corrupt political insiders in Canada violated the Free Trade Agreement, the NAFTA, the domestic laws of Canada and tried to rig or fix the outcome of a public tender process that took place in California where the small community of Goleta was looking for alternate water sources in the midst of the most severe drought in its history.
In British Columbia, in the 1980’s, public opinion and political opinion favored the development of a water export industry from coastal streams and rivers. There was ample water and, as long as fish stocks were protected, there was no apparent environmental or other concern with extracting a moderate amount of water from the abundance or water resources that flowed into the ocean annually. The Government of British Columbia estimated that about 400 million acre feet of water flows annually into the Pacific Ocean from the coast of British Columbia. This estimate excludes the Fraser river and rivers or streams flowing south, east and north.
In short, the quantities of water and sources of water available for export in British Columbia are so huge and so varied that they far outstrip any conceivable demand. These issues of supply and demand presented a practical business problem because free market competition would invariably lower prices and, therefore, lower profits.
The solution was a monopoly.
Monopolies are highly sensitive political issues. Typically, governments and the public resist monopolies because they know that the business people involved will gouge them with higher and ever higher prices.
So, the investors behind the bulk water export business hatched a bold and devious two step plan:
1. Obtain a source of abundant water for export from the British Columbia Government.
2. Use the environmental movement and the public media in Canada to persuade policy makers in the Governments of Canada and British Columbia to impose a ban on their competition.
The investors went to work, set up a company called W.C.W. Western Canada Water Enterprises Ltd., persuaded the British Columbia government to give it a source of water. Then they hired public relations firms and environmentalists to induce the fear in the general public that by permitting water exports Canada woud be drained dry and that the only solution was a ban or moratorium on bulk water exports. The scare mongering began. Canadians were told that fresh water was Canada’s most precious resource, that glaciers were melting, that lakes and rivers were drying up, that Canada could not risk selling any water to the USA and that the only solution was a prohibition on bulk water exports. Of course, the prohibition would not affect rights already acquired and WCW would then have a monopoly.
The plan was so brilliant that, to this very day, many Canadians actually believe that water or snow is Canada’s most precious resource when, in market terms, water is next to worthless - in most parts of Canada.
The plan was so brilliant that, to this very day, many Canadians believe that water comes from glaciers lakes and rivers when, in truth, it originates in the ocean.
That plan was so brilliant that, to this very day, most Canadians believe that water is a non-renewable resource like oil and that every drop of water exported is gone forever when, in fact, it pretty well returns every year in the form of snow and rain.
The plan was so brilliant that, to this very day, most Canadians believe that the creation of a few pipelines or aqueducts to deliver water to the United Sates and Mexico will forever destroy Canada’s environment.
The plan was brilliant, it was devious, and it would have been hugely profitable and, incidentally, tax free for many of the insiders who held their interests offshore.
The political and business insiders in Canada had selected their vehicle to make fabulous proifits, W.C.W. Western Canada Water Enterprises Ltd., but they had two viable competitors that needed to be destroyed. These were the joint venture project of two small companies, one American, Sun Belt Water Inc. based in Santa Barbara, California, and one Canadian, Snowcap Waters Ltd. based in Fanny Bay, B.C., and the small Vancouver based company, Aquasource Ltd.
As an ally of W.C.W. Western Canada Water Enterprises Ltd., that had bribed the governing political Social Credit Party with political donations, the British Columbia Government under the leadership of Bill Vander Zalm threw a multitude of regulatory hurdles in the path of the competitors that slowed them down but did not completely kill them so, eventually the Government used brute force to destroy the competition to W.C.W. Western Canada Water Enterprise Ltd. and broke the Canada US Free Trade Aggeement, the GATT and the Water Act and imposed the illegal moratorium on bulk water exports that denied all competitors the ability to get an bulk water export licence
Despite its brilliance the plans by the insiders did not work and they did not work for THREE fundamental reasons,
First, the plans were illegal. The plans were illegal because they violated the Water Act, a domestic law of the Province of British Columbia, they violated the Free Trade Agreement, an international trade treaty between Canada and the USA that was approved by the Province of British Columbia and binding on the Province, and they violated the General Agreement on Trade and Tariffs, an agreement that British Columbia and Canada were required to follow.
Because the plan was illegal, it was a well guarded secret and the Canadian public have been left with an incomplete understanding of the fraud that was foisted upon them while the nation was left with an ill-conceived and ill-thought out bulk water export policy that originated as part of a fraudulent conspiracy.
Secondly, WCW Western Canada Water Enterprises Ltd. were greedy and attempted to gouge the first US customer, the Goleta Water District, by pricing its water at 50% more than the American competitor, Sun Belt Water Inc.
In March 1991, the Goleta Water District selected Sun Belt Water Inc., after an open public competitive process, to supply approximately 7,500 acre feet of per year. The competing bid of W.C.W. Western Canada Water Enterprises Ltd. was rejected because of grossly over inflated pricing. Sun Belt Water Inc. and its Canadian partner, Snowcap Waters Ltd., were poised to become the first players in the emerging bulk water export import business.
Third, when the politicians and insiders in Canada saw that their plans had gone sideways, they went crazy, broke the Canada US Free Trade Agreement and announced that Sun Belt Water Ltd. would not be permitted to have access to fresh water from Canada and that only WCW could supply the water Goleta wanted.
The Government of British Columbia moved quickly and imposed its first moratorium, a moratorium it knew was illegal, on bulk water exports in order to prevent Sun Belt from getting water for export thereby attempting to force the Americans to do business with WCW at exorbitant prices in order to line the pockets of their friends.
With no fresh water to serve its customers, the Sun Belt venture, a small business, collapsed. Goleta refused to do business with WCW and WCW carried on for a few more years before collapsing into bankruptcy although it had raised over $100 million to finance its business
A few years later, Sun Belt Water Inc. retained a lawyer in Canada who started to move a claim forward in the Canada’s courts that would expose the criminals. The insiders moved quickly, manipulated the Canadian judiciary and shut down the Sun Belt case in Canada’s courts and financially and professionally destroyed the Sun Belt lawyer.
Having committed no crimes, the lawyer was jailed twice by the Governments of Canada and British Columbia, his business was destroyed by Government actions, he is effectively barred from practising law in British Columbia, where he successfully practised for 22 years from 1977 to 1999.
Governments in Canada have slandered and libelled his reputation. He is prevented from filing legal claims on his own behalf in the British Columbia courts. When summoned to court, in British Columbia, he is prevented from calling witnesses and denied the right to present evidence. Judges in British Columbia have fixed cases against him and his clients in order to undermine his economic survival.
In addition, Governments in Canada attached the woman who gave him some assistance. A mother of five children, a legal secretary and a nurse. She has been followed, spied on, her telephones have been monitored, her assets stolen by Canadian government agents. She and her young family were traumatized and thrown into chaos by the deliberate attacks of agents of the Governments of Canada and British Columbia acting through Canada’s politically controlled court system.
The lady and the lawyer went underground, dug up the dirt on their enemies and now nine of the judges who collaborated with the Canadian government and mis-used their powers on the bench are dead. Scores of crooked civil servants have been exposed as criminals and lost their jobs and three Governments that attacked them have been undermined and thrown out of power.
Not long after the period when Judge Delong had listened to STS’s impassioned oratory and viewed Professor Hall’s essay, the court was adjourned. The judge concluded by stating he was willing to stay until Thursday (i.e. for the full four days allotted for the trial) plus an extra day if necessary. The Judge’s looking ahead to a week-long trial can be deemed a victory for STS and his supporters as a five day event should allow for more evidence to be brought to light in a legal proceeding which is certainly one of the most significant trials ever to take place in Calgary. Judge Delong has been presented with a chance to create a beacon of a hope in a world afflicted with the prospect of never ending military strife as set in motion by the Cheney-Bush regime’s fraudulent Global War on Terror.
The Attempted Citizen’s Arrest of George W. Bush in a Canadian Court
By Anthony J. Hall
Global Research, March 11, 2010
Judge Manfred Delong shut down the trial of Splitting The Sky versus George W. Bush on the second day of proceedings. The court denied STS his frequently emphasized request to have two witnesses give evidence in his defense. Those witnesses were myself and Cynthia McKinney. The trial came to an end just as Ms. McKinney arrived in Calgary from London. The US-based oil conglomerates active throughout Alberta form the core business constituency of the Prime Minister Stephen Harper, who represents a Calgary riding in Parliament.
The court accepted two documents as evidence for the defense. On is Gail Davidson’s widely disseminated legal opinion for Lawyer’s Against the War. STS and I studied this document closely in the days leading up to my friend being arrested for his arrest attempt. LAW’s legal opinion highlighted some of the evidence, statutes and treaties to brand Bush as a “credibly accused war criminal” that should not be allowed into Canada. Prior to Bush’s touching down in Calgary to address an audience of oil executives, Davidson’s documemtation was distributed widely to officials of the Harper government and Canada’s Royal Canadian Mounted Police.
The other exhibit for the defense was my own paper that I originally presented at an invited academic venue at the University of Winnipeg. It has been published under a variety of titles on the Internet, including at Global Research.ca, 911 Blogger.com, 9/11 Truth.org and Voltairenet in both French and English. My initial title for it is “Bush League Justice: Should George W. Bush Be Arrested in Calgary Alberta and Tried for International Crimes.”
Delong will deliver his ruling on June 7. The case for the prosecution both revealed and obscured much about the new police strategies being employed throughout North America to monitor, manage, divide and spin doctor demonstrators seeking to call attention to their political dissent. In my opinion the Crown’s chief agent of prosecution, Tracy Davis, acted more as an advocate and defender of the police rather than as a representative of the Canadian people through Her Majesty as she is required to do according the constitutional tradition of the British Commonwealth.
It’s fairly evident from the manner in which this case was handled that the Zionist-controlled media in Canada and elsewhere doesn’t want the issue of Bush the Barbarous brought to the attention of the general public. A protracted trial in which credible authorities might offer evidence in the defense of the accused and, God forbid, Splitting the Sky is given an opportunity to actually voice his convictions, is not the Zionist way of doing business. Better to just quash the whole damn thing and once the issue has filtered out of the public’s mind then bring in a ruling further down the road to tyranny and censorship.
Splitting the Sky
It’s my humble, yet considered opinion, that Canada’s judiciary, like the msm, is so infiltrated, permeated and manipulated by these Zionist/Jew lobbyists and their lawyer henchmen and women, that our courts today are as likely to spawn honest and just decisions as the Zionist-controlled msm is likely to present information that hasn’t first been run through the Orwellian Double Speak wringer prior to general publication.
Both these institutions (and others) bear witness to the fact that our civil and legal infrastructures are firmly in the hands of foreign, seditious entities who are using them for power and control and manipulation of the collective mindset of the Canadian public while their subsidiary organs of control, i.e. the multinational corporations, be they oil or ag or pharma or cult or whatever, drain this country of its natural resource wealth and human potential.
Due to the Zionist’s inordinate and immoral power via their financial and media influences men like Anthony J. Hall are forced to equate the machinations of the courts and the police and media to secondary and tertiary linguistic labels such as “oil conglomerates” all in order to escape the deadly-poisoned arrows of the Zionists who let fly their “anti-Semitic,” “racist,” and “hate”-tipped barbs at anyone who comes near to calling a spade a spade or a Zionist a Zionist.
War Criminal psychopath G.W. Bush, like his War Criminal psychopathic partner in crime, Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper, are mere puppets to the Israeli Jew lobby; flunkies and lackeys and cretins of the most despicable type who, under their false pretense of being “Christians,” carry out the dirty work of slaughtering the sons and daughters of American and Canadian citizens in imperialist wars of aggression against innocent foreign nations all for the benefit of these Zionist interlopers who haunt and invade our very lives via their omnipresence throughout the media and Canada’s judiciary.
More than just a touch of levity as War Criminal Harper reaches out to G.W. Bush
_________________________________________________________________________
Well, these traitorous intruders have been releasing their bolts of vituperative lightning at me, my family and my publishing business for over two years in a relentless attempt to silence my voice and the voices of countless others whose opinions and views I carry via RadicalPress.com and the Yahoo group site known as Anti-Zionist Canada. They literally hate to see views and opinions and ideas and truths that conflict with their own morbid, draconian and hate-filled mission of destroying every nation state on the face of this globe in order to replace them with their “International” aka Zionist New World Order template of global governance.
What should have been a media bonus for the 911 Truth movement and the supporters of Palestinian sovereignty and a solid, direct hit on the forces of darkness that now control the global political and financial marketplace of ideas and opinion has once again been nullified and thwarted thanks to the machinations of those within the system as it now exists.
If we are ever to gain ground in this protracted battle with the Zionist forces we’re going to have to sooner than later face the fact that we must call these misfits by their real name and publicly identify them and the organizations through whom they operate in order to infiltrate our governmental, civic and social/cultural structures. Pussy-footing around this salient and critical factor because of fear and doubt will only prolong the time when the shyte must inevitably hit the proverbial fan and all fecal hell breaks loose.
Let us try our best in the interim time period to keep Splitting the Sky’s courageous efforts alive.
Shine your Light for Love, Peace & Justice for All,
Arthur Topham
Publisher/Editor
The Radical Press
Canada’s Radical News Network
“Digging to the root of the issues since 1998″
http://www.radicalpress.com
radical@radicalpress.com
Bush League Justice in Judge Manfred Delong’s Calgary Court
Anthony J. Hall
Professor of Globalization Studies
University of Lethbridge
10 March, 2010
Judge Manfred Delong shut down the trial of Splitting The Sky versus George W. Bush on the second day of proceedings. The court denied STS his frequently emphasized request to have two witnesses give evidence in his defense. Those witnesses were myself and Cynthia McKinney. The trial came to an end just as Ms. McKinney arrived in Calgary from London. The US-based oil conglomerates active throughout Alberta form the core business constituency of the Prime Minister Stephen Harper, who represents a Calgary riding in Parliament.
The court accepted two documents as evidence for the defense. One is Gail Davidson’s widely disseminated legal opinion for Lawyer’s Against the War. STS and I studied this document closely in the days leading up to my friend being arrested for his arrest attempt. LAW’s legal opinion highlighted some of the evidence, statutes and treaties to brand Bush as a “credibly accused war criminal” that should not be allowed into Canada. Prior to Bush’s touching down in Calgary to address an audience of oil executives, Davidson’s documentation was distributed widely to officials of the Harper government and Canada’s Royal Canadian Mounted Police.
The other exhibit for the defense was my own paper that I originally presented at an invited academic venue at the University of Winnipeg. It has been published under a variety of titles on the Internet, including at Global Research.ca, 911 Blogger.com, 9/11 Truth.org and Voltairenet in both French and English. My initial title for it is “Bush League Justice: Should George W. Bush Be Arrested in Calgary Alberta and Tried for International Crimes?”
Delong will deliver his ruling on June 7. The case for the prosecution both revealed and obscured much about the new police strategies being employed throughout North America to monitor, manage, divide and spin doctor demonstrators seeking to call attention to their political dissent. In my opinion the Crown’s chief agent of prosecution, Tracy Davis, acted more as an advocate and defender of the police rather than as a representative of the Canadian people through Her Majesty as she is required to do according the constitutional tradition of the British Commonwealth. ————–
Despite all the prattle about “tolerance”, the City of Calgary has decided to fire employees who hold the wrong political opinions and express them over the Internet.
Rene Scherger is a City of Calgary foreman and parks worker with 35 years experience. After “anti-racist” intolerants managed to entice the Calgary Sun (January 12, 21010) into doing an expose of Mr. Scherger’s outspoken views on Zionism (although the paper didn’t name him), the City launched an investigation.
Today, Mr. Scherger was informed he was being fired effective immediately for the off-duty expression on his own time of his political views over the Internet. The noice said the city “can not knowingly employ someone who has repeatedly published anti-Semitic material.” Okay, well what about a strident abortionist who publishes anti-Catholic or anti-Christian material? Or is it only one group that matters.
Mr. Scherger will not go quietly or give in to the censorship activities of the new politically correct witch hunters. He will be grieving his firing tomorrow.
Paul Fromm
Director
CANADIAN ASSOCIATION FOR FREE EXPRESSION INC.
“Off Duty Conduct
Following an investigation, the City of Calgary has concluded that:
* You were the owner and creator of an anti-Semitic website in the public domain;
*You affiliated yourself with other anti-Semitic websites in the public domain;
*You pubic ally identified yourself as a City employee in connection with these websites; and,
* The content (including linked content) on these websites was abhorrent and contrary to the values the City promotes.
This was widely reported in the media and put the reputation of the City at risk. The City prides itself as a workplace that values and promotes equality and diversity. Your conduct resulted in undue controversy and embarrassment to the City.
Your conduct was harmful to interests of the City and incompatible with your duties as a City employee and public servant. Amongst other things, the City has an obligation to provide a workplace and services to the public free of discrimination. It can not knowingly employ someone who has repeatedly published anti-Semitic material.
You did not show any remorse for your actions nor did you apologize. You have not acknowledged that the content on these websites was offensive. The City considers the employment relationship to have been irreparably damaged.
Your employment with the City of Calgary is terminated for just cause effective 2010 Feb. 08 Your rehire status at the City of Calgary will be documented as *Do NOT Rehire” (DNR).”
_______________________________________________
Canadian Association for Free Expression. http://www.CanadianFreeSpeech.com http://www.Canadafirst.net
The blogs are filled with venom and scorn for the Jewish religion. That much is obvious.
What isn’t so cut-and-dry is whether the alleged owner of the websites, a City of Calgary employee, can be punished for poisonous posts targeting Judaism and Zionism.
A full investigation of the employee, a 56-year-old foreman with Parks and Recreation, was launched Monday after the existence of at least two anti-Jewish blogs, both linked to the man, was revealed to city officials.
Described by one online watchdog as “one of the most twisted blogs you’ll ever see,” the sites both contain stories and articles targeting members of the Jewish religion, as well as anti-Jewish artwork.
The city is taking the matter very seriously, especially as one of the blogs and a Facebook site under the same name lists the City of Calgary and the Parks department as the man’s employer, for more than 30 years.
City officials confirm there is a foreman with Parks of the same name, and as a result, the city’s top lawyer has launched an investigation.
“We just became aware of the issue, so we are doing our investigation to determine an appropriate response — we need to determine a few facts, and then we can respond to this,” said City Solicitor Paul Tolley.
That the websites in question aren’t directly connected to the City of Calgary doesn’t necessarily protect the employee, whom the Sun has chosen not to name for now.
The city’s code of conduct for staff can include behaviour and actions outside of work hours, said Tolley.
“Sometimes the actions of an employee outside of the workplace can impact on their employment with the city and that’s something we’ll have to investigate,” said Tolley.
Given that the blogs in question contain vitriol towards Jews, Tolley acknowledges that a key question maybe the alleged owner’s role as a foreman, supervising people of all races and religions.
“That would be part of it, overall, but I can’t really say much about it, because I don’t want to compromise the investigation,” said Tolley.
The sites, updated as recently as August, came to the attention of the city and this newspaper after being highlighted on a separate, anti-racism blogsite, under the heading “Canadian Jew Hating Freak of the Day”.
The keeper of that blog included a warning to Calgarians: “FYI to all – If you live in Calgary you should know that you’re paying this guy’s salary. He works for the city in the parks and rec. dept. as a foreman.”
The websites connected to the anti-Jew blogs are a maze of links, containing conspiracy theories and essays aimed mainly at the Jewish religion, which is condemned as racist, power-hungry and corrupt.
It doesn’t appear the alleged owner of the blogs actually writes the material, though anti-Jewish words apparently penned by the same man can be found on plenty of online comment forums, under the same unique user handle.
As well, his Facebook page connects to one of the anti-Jewish blogs, where he is listed as owner.
Still, when contacted through an email address listed on one of the anti-Jewish blogs, the man denied running the website.
“What investigation? I went to the site and it is not my blogsite,” he wrote back.
The man did acknowledge a connection to the anti-Jewish site, but failed to explain why he was named as owner, complete with his age, occupation and profile picture.
“I am a follower as I am of many blogs, forums, websites and social sites,” he wrote.
And so the city, deserving of praise for launching an immediate investigation, will be forced to untangle the online mess.
The local Jewish community is taking a wait-and-see stance over the alleged connection to the City of Calgary, though leaders with the community wasted no time condemning the blogs.
“The places where the links take you are appalling and unfortunately, like many other inventions which benefit mankind, the web can be used for negative purposes,” said Calgary Jewish Community spokesman Adam Singer.
“There are parts of the web which have become a cesspool.”
Hey Canadians… what kind of a country do you think you live in? Not the one you grew up in? Or maybe you just didn’t have your eyes open?
Was Canada such a wonderful place before people like me come and torture you with the eye-clamps, and MAKE YOU SEE? Or were the perverts, the sex predators always with us, and better able to hide their antics before the advent of the internet?
Did you ever think you’d be hearing of rape rooms on Canadian bases? Maybe you’re shocked, but I am just confirmed in my beliefs, in what filth, perversion, sadism and pure evil lurk in the halls of power in Canada.
The stated goal of the US-led War in Afghanistan, according to the Obama Administration, is to defeat the Taliban and establish a stable democratic government over the entire country. Critical to that goal is establishing a professional Afghan army and police force that is not corrupt, and that has the respect of the Afghan people.
But reports out of Canada suggest that far from creating such a military and police force, the so-called International Security and Assistance Force (ISAF) is turning a blind eye to the thuggish criminality of those organizations, both to avoid growing opposition in ISAF member countries, and to avoid offending those organizations in Afghanistan.
The issue in question is routine rape and sodomy of children by Afghan soldiers and police operating on Canadian-run bases in the Kandahar region.
As reported last fall in the Ottawa Citizen newspaper, Canadian military chaplins and some soldiers have been complaining as far back as 2006 that Afghan security forces have been sodomizing young boys on their base. These military whistle-blowers charge that the military brass has been ignoring or burying their complaints, fearing the bad publicity they could generate.
The paper reports that Canadian military police have also complained, as reported by Brig.-Gen. J.C. Collin, commander of Land Force Central Area, that they were being told “not to interfere in incidents in which Afghan forces were having sex with children.”
According to the paper, the Canadian military command has argued that, even though sex with children is against the law in Afghanistan, the practice is culturally accepted and that the Canadian forces “should not get involved in what should be seen as a “cultural’ issue.”
Makes you wonder what other “cultural” issues involving Afghan security forces that the Western occupiers might not want to get involved in. Perhaps the oppression of women? That’s certainly part of the culture. How about bribery and extortion? Based on the evidence–that the police in Afghanistan are a wholly corrupt entity, and that the army is not much better–arguing that corruption is “culturally acceptable” would be easy to do. How about drug dealing? Again, that appears to be quite the culture in Afghanistan.
Kudos to the Canadian grunts, MPs and chaplins who found the sexual abuse of children more than they could stomach, and who brought their concerns to public attention at home in Canada when their own commanders sought to cover it up.
It makes me wonder, though, why here in the hyper-moralizing US, we haven’t heard a peep from our troops about similar behavior by Afghan forces on US-run bases.
It’s hard to believe that a practice so common on a Canadian base that it provoked such outrage among Canadian soldiers is not also occurring elsewhere.
This leaves us with two possiblities:
US soldiers and marines are just not as willing to go outside the chain of command and go public with their complaints, or
The US media are not interested in investigating this kind of story. It involves only Afghans, and who cares about Afghans? What American journalism covers is Americans. (Remember the big spate of stories about the sex escapades of guards at the US embassy in Kabul?)
I’d say it’s probably a combination of the two.
At any rate, the picture painted of Afghanistan’s army and police in the Ottawa Citizen article does not bode well for any plan that hinges on their taking over from US and ISAF troops any time soon…or for the fate of young children of Afghanistan, if and when they do.
___________________
DAVE LINDORFF is a Philadelphia-area journalist. His latest book is “The Case for Impeachment” (St. Martin’s Press, 2006). His work is available at www.thiscantbehappening.net
Here is another story on Shouten from the Ottawa Citizen:
Former Cpl. Travis Schouten spoke with the Citizen about the assaults he witnessed at Canada’s Forward Operating Base Wilson in Afghanistan in 2006.
Photograph by: Photo courtesy Travis Schouten, The Ottawa Citizen
Sex abuse and silence exposed
DND brass told of rape of boys by Afghan allies
By David Pugliese, The Ottawa CitizenSeptember 21, 2009
OTTAWA — Army staff and National Defence headquarters officials were told in 2007 that young boys had allegedly been sexually abused by Afghan security forces at a Canadian base in Afghanistan, but the concern at the time was that the incident might be reported in the news media, according to military records obtained by the Citizen.
In addition, last year Brig.-Gen. J.C. Collin, commander of Land Force Central Area, passed on to the senior army leadership the concerns raised by military police who said they had been told by their commanders not to interfere in incidents in which Afghan forces were having sex with children.
The newly released records raise questions about a military investigation that earlier this year concluded that allegations about sexual abuse of Afghan children by members of the Afghan army and police were unfounded. The Canadian Forces National Investigation Service also stated that its thorough investigation concluded allegations of such incidents were never reported to Canadian military commanders.
The allegations first surfaced publicly in June 2008 after concerns about the incidents, originally raised by soldiers and military chaplains, were reported in the news media.
Former Cpl. Travis Schouten told military officials he had witnessed an Afghan boy being sodomized by two Afghan security personnel at Canada’s Forward Operating Base Wilson in Afghanistan in 2006. Another soldier also came forward to a Toronto newspaper to report a similar occurrence at the same base in 2006. A military chaplain talked about the abuse in a report sent up the chain of command at Canadian Forces Base Petawawa. Two other chaplains have also come forward to state that soldiers came to them upset about such abuses.
The issue is sensitive for the Canadian Forces and the federal government as the Afghanistan mission has been promoted to the public as being about protecting Afghan civilians. The Afghan National Army and police are seen as key to Canada’s military withdrawal from that country in 2011.
It is the position of the Canadian Forces that its troops have no jurisdiction over the activities of Afghan military and police personnel, even those operating on Canadian bases.
The military records obtained by the Citizen through the Access to Information law note that a 90-minute meeting was held between an army public affairs staff member and a member of army commander Lt.-Gen. Andrew Leslie’s executive staff in the summer/fall of 2007. According to the June 2008 e-mail written by Lt.-Col. Stephane Grenier, an adviser on operational stress injuries, the meeting focused on various controversies that might be brought out in the news media, including, “ANP/ANA members having anal sex with young boys.”
ANP stands for Afghan National Police while ANA refers to Afghan National Army.
A second meeting about Afghan police and soldiers having sex with children was held later that week at National Defence headquarters involving senior members of the Defence Department’s civilian and military public affairs staff, according to the e-mail.
In addition, on June 18, 2008, Brig.-Gen. J.C. Collin, commander of Land Force Central Area, passed on to Leslie’s staff and Brig.-Gen. Ian Poulter the concerns raised by several military police officers. Collin called the e-mail from the military police commander, “rather disconcerting.”
Included were details from military police who noted it was well known among Canadian troops that ANA and ANP personnel had sex with kids. Another was upset that military police were told not to intervene in such matters, according to the e-mail.
“At this late date I cannot specifically remember who delivered the said briefings however I can say that it was delivered in Gagetown and that it sparked considerable debate amongst the MP pers(onnel),” noted one police officer in an e-mail Collin forwarded to the army’s senior staff. The e-mail had been written by Maj. V.R. Ethier, the commander of 2 MP Unit, the army military police unit of Ontario.
“Of greatest concern to the MP members was the belief that if they were (to) intervene in any instances of this nature that they would not be supported by the C o C,” the e-mail added. C o C is a military term for chain of command.
Having sex with children is against the law in Afghanistan, but some military officers have argued that since it is practised by some Afghans, particularly in Kandahar, then the Canadian Forces should not get involved in what should be seen as a “cultural” issue.
Maj. Francis Bolduc, deputy commanding officer of the Canadian Forces National Investigation Service, said his organization’s examination of the issue found no evidence to support the sexual abuse allegations.
He said a thorough review of military police records showed no complaints were made about the issue and “all the allegations were unfounded.” Bolduc noted that the investigation found the sexual abuse concerns were never reported to commanders.
Asked about the e-mails from Lt.-Col. Grenier and military police commander Maj. V.R. Ethier, he replied: “This is outside our lane.”
Bolduc said those issues could be looked at by a board of inquiry into the issue that had been ordered by Lt.-Gen. Leslie.
Last June, Defence Minister Peter MacKay told the House of Commons that troops would not turn a blind eye to the abuse of children. “Let us be clear, in no way, shape or form have Canadian soldiers and certainly the Canadian government ever condoned or excused allegations of sexual abuse against children in this country or anywhere else,” he said.
Another incident recounted in the Ethier e-mail detailed how a complaint was made about the sexual abuse of children to his chain of command in 2005-2006 in Kandahar and after that an Afghanistan commander dealt with the situation.
In addition, Brig.-Gen. Poulter received an e-mail on June 17, 2008 indicating that the sexual abuse issue had been raised by a Canadian colonel, a veteran of the war, during a military training session about Afghan culture. “He emphasized that it is not a practice that Afghan men discuss or practise in an open manner … one of those things that Afghans know happens but nobody talks about,” noted the e-mail to Poulter.
In addition, it appears senior Canadian commanders were also concerned about the abuse. In a June 13, 2008, letter to army commander Leslie, the office of Lt.-Gen. Michel Gauthier asked that an investigation be started into the sexual assault allegations. “Furthermore, initial queries suggest there appeared to be some concern of the part of the Roto 2 BG chain of command with respect to certain off-duty activities related to the same incidents later raised to the reporter,” the letter noted.
The records also indicate the allegations sparked much debate inside the military on what to acknowledge in public. The first response was to deny anything ever took place.
However, a series of “talking points” were produced on June 17, 2008, in which it was acknowledged in regard to “Afghan male sexual abuse of underage males” that “Soldiers are generally aware of this practice taking place in Afghanistan; They know that abuse, let alone of minors is wrong by our standards; They will report this activity to the appropriate authorities.”
It is unclear how the NIS investigation concluded the allegations were unfounded when other organizations inside the Canadian Forces were acknowledging that the sexual abuse was indeed taking place.
A board of inquiry, ordered by Leslie last year, is still under way. The board, which has not released its report, will look only at whether the one assault reported in media occurred. The board is to “identify the actions taken by individual CF members and the chain of command in response to that incident,” as well as assess whether medical care was provided to any soldier who witnessed the incident.
Recommendations will be made on how to address future incidents of that nature, noted the board of inquiry outline produced by Leslie.
Leslie will review the contents of the report even though, according to military records, a member of his staff was informed about the sexual abuse issue in 2007.
Leslie, through a spokesman, declined to be interviewed as the board is still ongoing.
Asked whether there was a conflict of interest in allowing Leslie to review the findings of the board examining how the senior army leadership responded, an army official noted that Chief of the Defence Staff Gen. Walt Natynczyk will also review the records.
CBC News
Federal government documents on Afghan detainees suggest that Canadian officials intended some prisoners to be tortured in order to gather intelligence, according to a legal expert.
If the allegation is true, such actions would constitute a war crime, said University of Ottawa law professor Amir Attaran, who has been digging deep into the issue and told CBC News he has seen uncensored versions of government documents released last year.
“If these documents were released [in full], what they will show is that Canada partnered deliberately with the torturers in Afghanistan for the interrogation of detainees,” he said.
“There would be a question of rendition and a question of war crimes on the part of certain Canadian officials. That’s what’s in these documents, and that’s why the government is covering up as hard as it can.”
Detainee abuse became the subject of national debate last year after heavily redacted versions of the documents were made public after Attaran filed an access to information request. They revealed the Canadian military was not monitoring detainees who had been transferred from Canadian to Afghan custody. It was later alleged that some of those detainees were being mistreated.
Until now, the controversy has centred on whether the government turned a blind eye to abuse of Afghan detainees.
However, Attaran said the full versions of the documents show that Canada went even further in intentionally handing over prisoners to torturers.
“And it wasn’t accidental; it was done for a reason,” he said. “It was done so that they could be interrogated using harsher methods.”
The government maintains that nothing improper happened.
“The Canadian Forces have conducted themselves with the highest performance of all countries,” Prime Minister Stephen Harper told the House of Commons Thursday.
But many facets of the issue remain top secret, such as the role of Canada’s elite Joint Task Force 2, or JTF2. There have been hints that JTF2 might be handling so-called high-value prisoners.
“High-value targets would be detained under a completely different mechanism that involved special forces and targeted, intelligence-driven operations,” Richard Colvin, a former senior diplomat with Canada’s mission in Afghanistan, told a parliamentary committee last November.
Colvin claimed that all detainees transferred by Canadians to Afghan prisons were likely tortured by Afghan officials. He also said that his concerns were ignored by top government officials and that the government might have tried to cover up the issue.
Opposition parties have been trying to get the Conservative government to release the uncensored versions of the documents pertaining to the handling of Afghan detainees.
The Conservatives insist that releasing uncensored files on the issue would damage national security. On Friday, Justice Minister Rob Nicholson asked former Supreme Court of Canada Justice Frank Iacobucci to review whether there would be “injurious” effects if some Afghan detainee documents were made public.
Nicholson did not give full details on Iacobucci’s assignment or a timetable for when the review might be completed.
However, opposition parties said Parliament is entitled to those documents regardless of what Iacobucci decides.
“Parliament is supreme,” said Ontario NDP MP Paul Dewar. “What this is, is a skate around Parliament.”
Liberal MP Ujjal Dosanjh said the government still has many questions to answer on the subject of detainees.
“Who knew what and when, and who allowed the continuing saga of Afghan detainees being sent to a potential risk of torture?” Dosanjh said.
It’s not clear whether the government will make Iacobucci’s advice public. Moreover, he is not a sitting judge and can’t legally rule or force the government to do anything.
Canadian Broadcasting Corporation
Now put that together with the fact that CSIS has been interrogating prisoners, and you get a more complete picture of Canada’s Depravity - Thanks Fredd for the link!
New documents show CSIS had a role in the interrogation of Taliban suspects captured by Canadians.
JOHN D. MCHUGH, AFP/GETTY IMAGES FILE PHOTO
OTTAWA–Canadian spies have been interrogating captured Taliban fighters in Afghanistan since 2006.
Officers with the Canadian Security Intelligence Service have been working with Canadian military police intelligence officers, according to heavily censored witness transcripts filed with the Military Police Complaints Commission.
CSIS acknowledged in 2006 that its members gathered intelligence in Afghanistan, but the spy service’s precise role has remained in the shadows until now.
Intelligence expert Wesley Wark says the revelations are disturbing, partly because CSIS would have had no specialized knowledge of how to elicit information from Afghan prisoners at the time.
“I find that stunning,” said Wark, a University of Toronto historian who believes when it came to skill in interrogating prisoners of war, CSIS “lacked it in spades” in 2006.
Maj. Kevin Rowcliffe, former staff adviser to Canada’s overseas operations commander, told investigators with the commission (which handles complaints about the military police) there was debate within the army itself about how much experience its intelligence officers had in grilling prisoners.
“There was a lot of discussion in my headquarters about who was qualified to do interrogations, because we’re not talking the normal police interview, we’re talking interrogations, which (censored) were doing, not (military police),” he says in an edited transcript of an interview on Dec. 6, 2007.
A copy of the transcript was obtained by The Canadian Press.
“(Military police) were involved in that, but they weren’t necessarily involved in interviewing or interrogation-related issues,” Rowcliffe, who has since retired from the military, told the investigators. “That would be (censored) or some other parade that had special training in interrogation.”
Sources familiar with the unedited version say the blanked-out references are to CSIS.
The spy agency is legally permitted to gather intelligence anywhere in the world concerning threats to the security of Canada. In recent years, it has increasingly operated abroad.
Another source familiar with the process said CSIS officers in Kandahar carried out what’s known as tactical field questioning, essentially the initial interrogations of suspects. They tried to sort out who was a simple field soldier and who was a bona fide insurgent commander.
The spies would sometimes make recommendations on which Taliban prisoners to hand over to the National Directorate of Security, Afghanistan’s notorious intelligence service, the sources said.
The final say on whether to transfer always rested with the military task force commander.
The Military Police Complaints Commission tried to ask questions about CSIS’s role in Kandahar but abandoned that approach when it became bogged down in legal challenges about its authority to investigate Ottawa’s overall prisoner transfer policy.
Last November diplomat-whistleblower Richard Colvin testified before a special House of Commons committee that most prisoners Canada handed over to the Afghan intelligence service were tortured – a claim the Conservative government and military commanders, past and present, angrily denied.
Rowcliffe’s interview transcript prompts questions about whether the military and CSIS officers had enough time to conduct proper interrogations so early on in the insurgency, when newly arrived troops had little intelligence on the threats they faced.
The military has 96 hours after capture to decide whether to hand a prisoner over to Afghan authorities, but Rowcliffe said there was pressure to turn them over sooner.
He said he took up the concerns with the commander of overseas operations, saying: “I understand the time sensitiveness of this issue to the Government of Canada, but we may have Osama bin Laden, yet you are trying to get me to give him over as quickly as possible.”
Often his superior’s answer was “no.” His boss, Lt.-Gen. Michel Gauthier, indicated his hands were tied and told Rowcliffe the federal government’s policy was firm.
“I said we need to take the time to do a proper investigation, interview, interrogation, whatever you want to call it, to confirm who we have and what has this guy done or gal done,” Rowcliffe said in his statement.
He was asked by commission investigators how he thought the military would obtain its intelligence if the instructions were to transfer detainees quickly to the Afghans.
“My impression was they didn’t seem to care about that,” said Rowcliffe. “I don’t know if they didn’t grasp the importance of it, or just that it was not important because the pressure was … to get rid of them because of the Government of Canada.”
He said he wasn’t sure whether there was pressure from the defence minister and chief of defence staff.
“I have no idea, but I know from Gen. Gauthier’s position that (it was): Get rid of them as quickly as you can and what’s taking so long? That’s the kind of questions I’d get.”
Security expert Wark said these latest revelations will likely fuel human rights groups’ fears that Canada was outsourcing interrogation to the Afghan security forces.
Canada went into Kandahar thinking the Taliban and Al Qaeda were merely “a nuisance,” he said, and there was a “ferocious underestimation” of the mission.
“The military simply had no expertise. It had been decades since they had to interrogate prisoners of war,” Wark said. “And if the military lacked that expertise, you can be sure, CSIS lacked it in spades.”
He said hard questions must be asked about how much knowledge CSIS had of Afghanistan and its complex tribal network in 2006.
“The answer would be very little,” he said. “They didn’t have a trained body of people with the language skills, knowledge of the country, knowledge of the tribal situation, who was in charge of which warlord group, what was the nature of the Taliban. Those are all issues they had to develop an expertise on after 2006.”
CSIS spokeswoman Isabelle Scott, in response to media questions, said the agency does not publicly discuss operations.
She did confirm CSIS has had a presence in Afghanistan “for the past few years” and provides intelligence “in support of the safety and security of Canadian and allied forces on the ground.” She also said CSIS gathers intelligence in Afghanistan “to mitigate potential security threats to Canada.”
It was CSIS activities in Kandahar that caught the attention of the spy agency’s inspector general, Eva Plunkett, who investigated “policy gaps and inconsistencies.”
The declassified version of Plunkett’s 2007 certificate – a top secret report card on CSIS prepared for the public safety minister – contained no suggestion that the spy service had done anything wrong or illegal.
The certificate noted Afghanistan was “a fundamental intelligence priority” and commended CSIS for impressive work “in an extremely challenging environment.”
But it warned that CSIS and National Defence lacked clear policies that would “guide future (censored) activities in this theatre.”
Agreements between the spy service and military were out of date, said the annual certificate, made public in May 2008.
“I do believe that those who serve in this environment deserve to be equipped with the policy framework to guide their work.”
Free Speech lawyer Douglas Christie shares his thoughts on the release of Ernst Zundel, imprisoned in Germany for five years on word-related crimes. The part of Canada in the Zundel case by holding a secret trial, later found to be unconstitutional, is questioned.
We have compiled evidence of the overweening and deleterious influence of Zionism on Canada's foreign and domestic policies
Israel is a terrorist, apartheid state that bombs civilian neighbourhoods and hospitals, and engages in ethnic cleansing against it's enemies and covert terror against it's 'friends'.
In Canada, the Israel Lobby - a web of organizations presided over by a handful of Jewish billionaires, who head the nominal "Jewish groups" that together with media that is owned by some of the same billionaires - has shaped Canada's policy to favour Israel's security interests at the expense of Canada's.
Every political leader of every mainstream party genuflects to these groups, and adheres to the falsehoods they perpetrate through their lobbying and media efforts.
"Wait," you say, "what of the Americans who outnumber Canadians 10 to 1 and are our biggest trading partner? Surely they have more influence over Canada than a tiny middle eastern country?"
If you do your research, you find that the USA is controlled by the Zionists as well:
"The bottom line is that AIPAC, a de facto agent for a foreign government, has a stranglehold on Congress"
-write Ivy League professors John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt in- The Israel Lobby
Thus the Canadian political class is lockstep with the Zionist's war agenda against Iran.
I notice that Ezra Levant is getting a lot of play in blogs lately for his exposure of the CJC running and funding the Canadian Nazi Party. The execrable Levant is being portrayed as a hero, but he has a lot in common with the CJC types. He takes the opportunity to perpetuate the Zionist myths of what happened in WWII according to the script that is at the same time drilled into the heads of Canadians. Pro-freedom and anti-Zionist Blogs should rather link to Authentic free speech hero Arthur Topham's superb deconstruction of this neocon:
The War OF Terror is a sham, authored by the CIA stooge and terror celebrant PM Benjamin Netanyahu, for the aspirations of greater Isr-el and opportunists in the US government.
Note the CJC subversive MP Irwin Cotler is introducing a bill against Iran...
No plans to censure or boycott terrorist Isr-el - no in fact Harper is getting awards from the so-called "Jewish groups", that are no more than political fronts for a foreign power. The Zionists are liars and their hubris, chutzpah and hypocrisy knows no bounds.
"We have remarked on the strange omission of works which one might expect in our libraries, works which treat of the phenomenon of parasitic communities in human civilizations. And we have suggested that these works have not been written because the parasite exercises control over the academic and scholarly life of the host. Is this a fantastic conclusion? Not at all … Since the host is physically stronger than the parasite, obviously the parasite cannot control him through physical strength. Then he must exercise mental control. How is this done? The Jewish parasite controls the gentile host through an entire class of gentiles which he has created, and who serve him by maintaining control over the gentile host. This class is known as the shabez goi."
George Galloway Banned from Canada by j-wish Terrorists
The parties are all controlled. No one will challenge Zionist power, or even admit it exists. Those who expose it are expelled from the halls of power.
Take a moment to donate $5 or $50 to Arthur Topham's free speech fight via Paypal(click Donate button):
Don't Hate the J-ws
Those people with the J-wish names who own the media and banks are more tied in with a global elite that dispenses their poison through myriad Lobby groups. Ordinary J-ws are just as brainwashed by Zionists as the rest of the population.
Heutig ZeitGeist
In Germany, our entire nation is now emerging out of the fake and false holocaust guilt, which was criminally imposed upon us by the Jewish terrorists and Jewish liars 60 years ago. We no longer believe in the “Holocaust Lie” of 6 million and while we still believe that Hitler was a criminal, we think that he killed only 300,000 to 400,000 people (including the Jews) and no more. British Nazis also played a very important & criminal part in inventing and sustaining the lie of 6 million against our whole nation. Furthermore, the British Nazis themselves killed 100 million people in the asian & african colonies (including Pakistan) and looted the whole world with both hands, which makes them the biggest criminals of the world, because they killed 100 million, while Hitler killed only 300,000.
Senseless Horrors like D-Day are Celebrated as Necessary
Comments